At the end of August, for the first time (and not just because of the rain, but partly that!), we had to cancel our monthly Hastings Wild Church gathering.
We’d planned to mark the Feast of Creation in Christ, an early-September celebration already well established in the Orthodox church and other traditions, and now instituted into the Anglican church calendar.
Not having much experience of traditional church rhythms, the whole idea was new to me and caught my attention when I first read about it.
Apparently, the Church of England has always had a Season of Creation, culminating in the Feast of St Francis of Assisi on 4th Oct, but had now officially adopted the Feast of Creation in Christ at the start of that season, in communion with the Orthodox church.

Celebrating Nature and her place in the Divine order is kind of what our Wild Church group does all year round – you might therefore think this feast would be more suited to mainstream churches that are more heavenly-minded and less Earth-bound – so why would we decide to mark the Feast of Creation in Christ?
A big part of the reason is the ‘in Christ’ part.
Although the purpose of Hastings Wild Church is to connect with God (or the Divine) and each other through Nature, it’s also (unashamedly and unapologetically) a vehicle for me to work out the evolution of my faith with others, sharing my thoughts and benefitting from their perspectives.
I’ve been on a faith-shifting journey for some years. Jesus remains important to me – I’m just not sure if I can quite put into words how, only that I can’t easily relate to many of the mainstream church expressions about him.
So, thinking about Creation in Christ appeals. The idea of discussing what this means with my Wild Church friends appeals to the continuing evolution of my faith.
Having now cancelled our August session, I thought I’d outline some of what I had in mind for that discussion here and invite comments from the group and from anyone else reading this.
(Feel free to comment at the bottom of this page; or Wild Church friends can message me in the usual ways.)
I’d always been led to believe that Christ simply meant Messiah or Anointed One – a title reserved for Jesus alone.
In more recent years I’ve picked up a broader view of Christ – not only from Richard Rohr, but also from other contemplatives and mystics, going back many centuries – as referring to God’s blueprint generally for the Universe, birthed more specifically in Jesus.

(all photos here taken recently)
Key to the idea of Creation in Christ are these familiar words from John 1:
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.”

My plan for our August session was to invite participants to spend some time sitting in silence with whatever being “in Christ” means to them individually, and then to look at the following quotes together, which would be better suited to describing the contemplative view of Creation in Christ than my own stumbling attempts!

First, from Franciscan Friar, Richard Rohr:
‘What if we’ve missed the point of who Christ is, what Christ is, and where Christ is? I believe that a Christian is simply one who has learned to see Christ everywhere. Understanding the Universal or Cosmic Christ can change the way we relate to creation, to other religions, to other people, to ourselves, and to God.
The Universal Christ is present in both Scripture and Tradition, and the concept has been understood by many mystics, though not as a focus of mainline Christianity. (See John 1:1-5, Colossians 1:15-20, Ephesians 1:9-12 if you think this is some new idea.) We just didn’t have the eyes to see it.
The Universal Christ is Divine Presence pervading all of creation since the very beginning. My father Francis of Assisi (1181–1226) intuited this presence and lived his life in awareness of it.
Teilhard de Chardin (1881–1955) brought this insight into our modern world.
God’s first “idea” was to become manifest—to pour out divine, infinite love into finite, visible forms. The “Big Bang” is now our scientific name for that first idea; and “Christ” is our Christian theological name. Both are about love and beauty exploding outward in all directions. Creation is indeed the Body of God!
In the early Christian era, only a few Eastern Fathers (such as Origen of Alexandria and Maximus the Confessor) noticed that the Christ was clearly historically older, larger, and different than Jesus himself. They mystically saw that Jesus is the union of human and divine in space and time; Christ is the eternal union of matter and Spirit from the beginning of time.’

Second, from John Philip Newell on Edwin Muir, the Scottish poet and novelist:
‘Muir was always attracted to the robust and elemental energies of the natural world in his sense of what is real and true spirituality. And later in life he was critical of the way Western Christianity had turned the Incarnation into a religious idea that focused limitedly on Jesus rather than expressing the primal embodiment of the divine in Earth and humanity. In his poem “The Incarnate One”, in which he imagines sitting in an austere Scottish Presbyterian church in the north of Scotland with its hard wooden pews and raised central pulpit, Muir writes, “And the Word made flesh is here made Word again.” He is describing a way of seeing in which the Incarnation becomes a creedal statement of belief about the divine rather than looking for it in the colours, textures and forms of Earth and the human mystery. It was a religious teaching that treated Jesus as an exception to humanity rather than a manifestation of what is deepest in every human being and every life-form.’
(from The Great Search by John Philip Newell, p.170)

And lastly, from Franciscan sister and theologian, Ilia Delio:
‘Christ is more than Jesus. Christ is the communion of divine personal love expressed in every created form of reality—every star, leaf, bird, fish, tree, rabbit and every human person. Everything is christified because everything expresses divine love incarnate. However, Jesus Christ is the “thisness” of God (“God is like this and this is God”) so what Jesus is by nature, everything else is by grace (divine love). We are not God but every single person is born out of the love of God, expresses this love in [their] unique personal form and has the capacity to be united with God. . . . Because Jesus is the Christ, every human is already reconciled with every other human in the mystery of divine [love] so that Christ is more than Jesus alone; Christ is the whole reality bound in a union of love.
We cannot know this mystery of Christ as a doctrine or an idea; it is the root reality of all existence.’

Would it be over-simplification to summarise these quotes as ‘Everything is sacred’?! Perhaps.
In any case, with all the above in mind, I’m including a fourth quote from a recent Guardian article on Global Heating (the newer, scientifically-preferred term for global warming).
Note the ‘religious’ language in a non-religious article, in describing the human desecration of our sacred habitat.

This is not a natural calamity: it is being done to us knowingly: by Tim Winton
‘A narrow class of people is profiting from our anguish. They know they’re setting our world on fire. They persist because they love neither the Earth nor its people. What they care about is money. Not just enough to get by on. Not even enough to become grotesquely rich with. They want the kind of money that bends others to their will. They seek power, buy it, co-opt it, leverage it and always thirst for more of it. As far as they’re concerned, the rest of us can go to hell – so long as we bend the knee and keep paying them as we stagger towards the flames.’

The questions I’d prepared for discussion were:
- What does Creation in Christ mean to you personally?
- What is the relationship between Jesus and Creation?
- What are the implications for us practically in terms of our own relationship to Earth, to Creation, to Christ, to Jesus?
- Does this have any implication for you personally? E.g. in relation to looking after the Earth?
As mentioned earlier, please feel free to comment/reply, in any way you choose.

We were going to finish our gathering by sharing in the earthly elements of communion, reminding us of our oneness with each other, with God and Christ, and with Creation.
And I’d adapted the Lord’s Prayer for the Feast of Creation in Christ, to recite with our communion, as follows:
Source of All Life, Source of Everything Physical and Spiritual, Mother / Father of all Humankind,
May all that You’ve made be treated as sacred, as expressions of who You are;
May we, with Your Spirit’s help, nurture the world and the people around us, towards healing and wholeness
According to Your loving will –
Earth reflecting the Divine.
May we be faithful stewards of the resources You’ve given us, so there may be enough for everyone;
Forgive us for not treating the Earth and each other as we would have others treat us,
as we also forgive ourselves and others;
And lead us away from paths of destruction – of self, others and Earth,
For we are helpless on our own but trust that all things are possible in Your power.
Amen.

With love, in Christ,
Roger



























































































